By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Universal Times MagazineUniversal Times MagazineUniversal Times Magazine
  • Home
  • Industries
    • Automobile
    • Aviation
    • Banking
    • Cryptocurrency
    • E- Commerce
    • EdTech
    • Energy and Petroleum
    • Fintech
    • FMCG
    • Information Technology
    • NBFC
    • Oil
    • Pharmacy
    • Telecom
    • Other Business News
  • Blogs
  • World
  • Jobs
  • Careers
  • About us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
Search
Copyright © 2020-2024 Universal Times Magazine. All Rights Reserved.
Reading: Why Calcutta HC bars HUL from using ‘Glow & Handsome’ mark?
Share
Notification
Aa
Universal Times MagazineUniversal Times Magazine
Aa
  • Home
  • Industries
  • Blogs
  • World
  • Jobs
  • Careers
  • About us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
Search
  • Home
  • Industries
    • Automobile
    • Aviation
    • Banking
    • Cryptocurrency
    • E- Commerce
    • EdTech
    • Energy and Petroleum
    • Fintech
    • FMCG
    • Information Technology
    • NBFC
    • Oil
    • Pharmacy
    • Telecom
    • Other Business News
  • Blogs
  • World
  • Jobs
  • Careers
  • About us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
Follow US
  • Home
  • Industries
  • Blogs
  • World
  • Jobs
  • Careers
  • About us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
Copyright © 2020-2024 Universal Times Magazine. All Rights Reserved.

Advertisement

Universal Times Magazine > Blog > FMCG > Why Calcutta HC bars HUL from using ‘Glow & Handsome’ mark?
FMCG

Why Calcutta HC bars HUL from using ‘Glow & Handsome’ mark?

Shweta
Last updated: 2024/04/11 at 9:20 AM
Shweta
Share
3 Min Read
SHARE

Advertisement

The Calcutta High Court (HC) has issued an order restraining consumer goods major Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL) from using the ‘Glow & Handsome’ mark to sell its range of men’s care products following a suit filed by rival Emami Ltd.

The court has granted HUL a month to take the “necessary” steps to comply with the order passed on 9 April.

In a statement, a spokesperson for HUL said the Calcutta HC has issued an order of injunction for passing-off after almost four years in the suit filed by Emami. “We are reviewing the order and will take appropriate action.”

The move follows a 2020 dispute between the two companies after HUL renamed its men’s fairness cream brand to ‘Glow & Handsome’ which bears a similarity to Emami’s ‘Fair & Handsome’ brand of men’s personal care products.

Emami had then filed a suit against HUL alleging infringement and challenging the latter’s use of the ‘Glow & Handsome’ mark.

“It is alleged that the respondent’s use of the mark ‘Glow and Handsome’ constitutes infringement of the petitioner’s mark ‘Fair and Handsome’. ‘Glow and Handsome’ is deceptively similar to the petitioner’s registered mark. ‘Handsome’ being a prominent, leading, and essential feature of the petitioner’s mark, has also acquired distinctiveness and a secondary meaning. Being a prior user and the first in the men’s fairness cream segment, the adoption and use of the mark ‘Glow and Handsome’ is therefore misleading and deceptive,” the court said in its order, a copy of which has been seen by Mint.

According to the order, Emami has been able to make out a strong prima facie case on merits insofar as the matter of passing-off is concerned.

In 2020, HUL changed the name of its skin care brand from ‘Fair & Lovely’ to ‘Glow & Lovely’, after deciding to drop the word ‘fair’ from its brand of personal care products to make it more inclusive. Subsequently, its men’s range was renamed ‘Glow & Handsome’.

Emami’s Fair & Handsome was originally launched in 2005, a year before HUL’s entry into the segment. Till financial year 2020, Fair & Handsome reported total sales of over ₹2,430 crore. Emami has spent over ₹400 crore since 2005 to advertise and market the brand.

- Advertisement -
Ad image

“The registrations in favour of the mark ‘Fair and Handsome’ are long prior to the respondent’s adoption and use of the infringing mark ‘Glow and Handsome’. Admittedly, both the rival products are in the same class of goods. The petitioner also alleges to be the market leader having more than 65% of the share in the men’s fairness cream segment,” according to the order.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by Universal Times Magazine staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Advertisement

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
[mc4wp_form]
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Shweta April 11, 2024 April 11, 2024
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Copy Link
Share
Previous Article Tesla JV with Reliance?
Next Article Gaza war: Why Israel seeks India’s help to boost its construction sector?

Stay Connected

2.2k Followers Like
727 Followers Follow
25.7k Followers Follow
444 Subscribers Subscribe

Advertisement

Advertisement

Latest News

Advertisement

Advertisement

Follow US
Copyright © 2020-2025 Universal Times Magazine. All Rights Reserved.
adbanner
AdBlock Detected
Our site is an advertising supported site. Please whitelist to support our site.
Okay, I'll Whitelist
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?

Subscribe For Latest Updates

Sign up to best of business news, informed analysis and opinions on what matters to you.

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Thanks for subscribing!